<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.adweek.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.adweek.com/nodequeue/1">
  <channel>
    <icon>http://www.adweek.com/sites/all/themes/aw/images/feed_logo.ico</icon>
    <logo>http://www.adweek.com/sites/all/themes/aw/images/feed_logo.png</logo>
    <title />
    <link>http://www.adweek.com/nodequeue/1</link>
    <description />
    <language>en</language>
        <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.adweek.com/adweek/featured-articles" /><feedburner:info uri="adweek/featured-articles" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
 <title>Skechers Settles Deceptive Ad Case With FTC for $40M</title>
 <link>http://feeds.adweek.com/~r/adweek/featured-articles/~3/q5XR6QFY1R0/skechers-settles-deceptive-ad-case-ftc-40m-140577</link>
 <description>&lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/skechers-settles-deceptive-ad-case-ftc-40m-140577"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/node-detail/news_article/unknown_1.jpeg" alt="" title=""  class="imagecache imagecache-node-detail" width="652" height="367" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;
	When it comes to cracking down on health and fitness claims in ads, the Federal trade Commission isn&amp;#39;t sitting on its butt.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/skechers-settles-deceptive-ad-case-ftc-40m-140577" target="_blank"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adweek/featured-articles/~4/q5XR6QFY1R0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding">Advertising &amp; Branding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/david-vladeck">David Vladeck</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/deceptive-advertising">deceptive advertising</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/federal-trade-commission">Federal Trade Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/skechers">Skechers</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katy Bachman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">140577 at http://www.adweek.com</guid>
 <media:content url="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/general-thumbnail/news_article/unknown_1.jpeg" type="image/jpeg"> <media:title type="plain">Skechers Settles Deceptive Ad Case With FTC for $40M</media:title>
 <media:credit role="photographer">Katy Bachman</media:credit>
 <media:thumbnail url="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/general-thumbnail/news_article/unknown_1.jpeg" />
</media:content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/skechers-settles-deceptive-ad-case-ftc-40m-140577</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Six Questions: Dominic Proctor</title>
 <link>http://feeds.adweek.com/~r/adweek/featured-articles/~3/K6J3E9L3c6A/six-questions-dominic-proctor-140580</link>
 <description>&lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/video/advertising-branding/six-questions-dominic-proctor-140580"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/node-detail/1126101268_1642724637001_ari-origin06-arc-166-1337191707594.jpgpubid1126101268" alt="" title=""  class="imagecache imagecache-node-detail" width="480" height="268" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Six Questions: Dominic Proctor&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adweek/featured-articles/~4/K6J3E9L3c6A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding">Advertising &amp; Branding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/adweek-orginal-0">Adweek Orginal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/six-questions">Six Questions</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 17:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">140580 at http://www.adweek.com</guid>
 <media:content url="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/general-thumbnail/1126101268_1642724637001_ari-origin06-arc-166-1337191707594.jpgpubid1126101268" type="application/octet-stream"> <media:title type="plain">Six Questions: Dominic Proctor</media:title>
 <media:credit role="photographer" />
 <media:thumbnail url="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/general-thumbnail/1126101268_1642724637001_ari-origin06-arc-166-1337191707594.jpgpubid1126101268" />
</media:content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.adweek.com/video/advertising-branding/six-questions-dominic-proctor-140580</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Kimmel Skewers ABC Rivals in Traditional Upfront Bit</title>
 <link>http://feeds.adweek.com/~r/adweek/featured-articles/~3/5e4qZL4ToZY/kimmel-skewers-abc-rivals-traditional-upfront-bit-140567</link>
 <description>&lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/television/kimmel-skewers-abc-rivals-traditional-upfront-bit-140567"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/node-detail/news_article/jimmy-kimmel-hed-2012.jpg" alt="" title=""  class="imagecache imagecache-node-detail" width="652" height="367" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;
	In what has become a snarky rite of spring, ABC late-night host Jimmy Kimmel on Tuesday afternoon affectionately skewered his network, before turning his sights on the competition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/television/kimmel-skewers-abc-rivals-traditional-upfront-bit-140567" target="_blank"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adweek/featured-articles/~4/5e4qZL4ToZY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/television">Television</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/2012-13-tv-season">2012-13 TV Season</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/2012-13-upfront">2012-13 Upfront</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/666-park-avenue">666 Park Avenue</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/abc">Abc</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/alyssa-milano">Alyssa Milano</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/andre-braugher">Andre Braugher</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/anne-sweeney">Anne Sweeney</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/anthony-edwards">Anthony Edwards</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/connie-britten">Connie Britten</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/don-t-trust-b-apartment-23-0">Don’t Trust the B---- in Apartment 23.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/guillermo-del-toro">Guillermo del Toro</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/happy-endings">Happy Endings</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/hayden-panettiere">Hayden Panettiere</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/how-move-your-parents-rest-your-life">How to Move in With Your Parents (For the Rest of Your Life)</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/hulk">Hulk</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/jimmy-kimmel">Jimmy Kimmel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/last-man-standing">Last Man Standing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/malibu-country">Malibu Country</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/mistresses">Mistresses</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/nashville">Nashville</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/television/networks">Networks</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/once-upon-time">Once Upon a Time</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/paul-lee">Paul Lee</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/radha-mitchell">Radha Mitchell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/television/ratings">Ratings</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/red-widow">Red Widow</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/family-tools">The Family Tools</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/neighbors">The Neighbors</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/zero-hour">The Zero Hour</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/television/upfront">Upfront</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/upfront">Upfront</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/upfronts">Upfronts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/yunjin-kim">Yunjin Kim</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 02:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anthony Crupi</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">140567 at http://www.adweek.com</guid>
 <media:content url="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/general-thumbnail/news_article/jimmy-kimmel-hed-2012.jpg" type="image/jpeg"> <media:title type="plain">Kimmel Skewers ABC Rivals in Traditional Upfront Bit</media:title>
 <media:credit role="photographer">Anthony Crupi</media:credit>
 <media:thumbnail url="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/general-thumbnail/news_article/jimmy-kimmel-hed-2012.jpg" />
</media:content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.adweek.com/news/television/kimmel-skewers-abc-rivals-traditional-upfront-bit-140567</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Data Points: Online, There Are No Crowds</title>
 <link>http://feeds.adweek.com/~r/adweek/featured-articles/~3/rYM4AXLhpPI/data-points-online-there-are-no-crowds-140534</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;!--[CDATA[&lt;p--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	This might come as a surprise to any woman who&amp;rsquo;s tried to drag a man through the mall, but online, men are shopping more and at rates higher than before, according to an iProspect study of men with a household income of $100,000 plus. The vast majority (84 percent) are buying for themselves (just 1 percent admitted someone else does their shopping for them online).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/data-points-online-there-are-no-crowds-140534" target="_blank"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adweek/featured-articles/~4/rYM4AXLhpPI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding">Advertising &amp; Branding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/technology">Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding/marketing">Marketing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/technology/commerce">Commerce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/technology/data">Data</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/e-commerce">e-commerce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/technology/mobile">Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/press/online">Online</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding/retail">Retail</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 10:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lucia Moses</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">140534 at http://www.adweek.com</guid>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/data-points-online-there-are-no-crowds-140534</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>The Suite Smell of Success</title>
 <link>http://feeds.adweek.com/~r/adweek/featured-articles/~3/BAbQgEPIACA/suite-smell-success-140524</link>
 <description>&lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/press/suite-smell-success-140524"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/node-detail/news_article/tt-lucky-hed-2012.jpg" alt="" title=""  class="imagecache imagecache-node-detail" width="652" height="367" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;
	The economic recovery seems to have passed magazines by, but there&amp;rsquo;s one area that&amp;rsquo;s still growing: the corporate suite.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/press/suite-smell-success-140524" target="_blank"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adweek/featured-articles/~4/BAbQgEPIACA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/press">The Press</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/press/apps">Apps</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/bonnier-corp">Bonnier Corp.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/conde-nast">Conde Nast</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/cond-nast-entertainment-group">Condé Nast Entertainment Group</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/hearst-corp">Hearst Corp.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/press/online">Online</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/press/tablet">Tablet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/press/magazine">Magazine</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lucia Moses</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">140524 at http://www.adweek.com</guid>
 <media:content url="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/general-thumbnail/news_article/tt-lucky-hed-2012.jpg" type="image/jpeg"> <media:title type="plain">The Suite Smell of Success</media:title>
 <media:credit role="photographer">Lucia Moses</media:credit>
 <media:thumbnail url="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/general-thumbnail/news_article/tt-lucky-hed-2012.jpg" />
</media:content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.adweek.com/news/press/suite-smell-success-140524</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>GE Bulbs Switch to Color Coding</title>
 <link>http://feeds.adweek.com/~r/adweek/featured-articles/~3/7AVcM21nVQs/ge-bulbs-switch-color-coding-140526</link>
 <description>&lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/ge-bulbs-switch-color-coding-140526"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/node-detail/news_article/tt-lightbulb-hed-2012.jpg" alt="" title=""  class="imagecache imagecache-node-detail" width="652" height="367" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;
	Twenty-two years ago, the government raised hackles in the food industry by requiring a &amp;ldquo;Nutrition Facts&amp;rdquo; label on packaged edibles. Now, regulators have a new target: lightbulbs. Starting this year, the FTC will require the makers of all incandescent, compact fluorescent and LED fixtures to affix a &amp;ldquo;Lighting Facts&amp;rdquo; label on their packaging.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/ge-bulbs-switch-color-coding-140526" target="_blank"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adweek/featured-articles/~4/7AVcM21nVQs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding">Advertising &amp; Branding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding/marketing">Marketing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/federal-trade-commission">Federal Trade Commission</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/ftc">Ftc</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/general-electric">General Electric</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding/packaged-goods">Packaged Goods</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding/retail">Retail</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 11:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Robert Klara</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">140526 at http://www.adweek.com</guid>
 <media:content url="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/general-thumbnail/news_article/tt-lightbulb-hed-2012.jpg" type="image/jpeg"> <media:title type="plain">GE Bulbs Switch to Color Coding</media:title>
 <media:credit role="photographer">Robert Klara</media:credit>
 <media:thumbnail url="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/general-thumbnail/news_article/tt-lightbulb-hed-2012.jpg" />
</media:content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/ge-bulbs-switch-color-coding-140526</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item>
 <title>Brand #Fail</title>
 <link>http://feeds.adweek.com/~r/adweek/featured-articles/~3/JL90V8w0vM4/brand-fail-140368</link>
 <description>&lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/brand-fail-140368"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/node-detail/news_article/unknown-1_1.jpeg" alt="" title=""  class="imagecache imagecache-node-detail" width="652" height="367" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;
	Social media? For too many brands, it might feel more like anti-social media.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
	It&amp;rsquo;s no secret that the rush of consumers and advertisers to Facebook and Twitter has made it ever easier for the masses to be heard&amp;mdash;and for brands to mess up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/brand-fail-140368" target="_blank"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/adweek/featured-articles/~4/JL90V8w0vM4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding">Advertising &amp; Branding</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding/food-beverage">Food &amp; Beverage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding/marketing">Marketing</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/belvedere">Belvedere</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/press/blogs">Blogs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/dell-hell">Dell Hell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/technology/facebook">Facebook</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/havas">Havas</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/jeff-jarvis">Jeff Jarvis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/mcdonalds">McDonalds</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/press/online">Online</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/technology/social">Social</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/socialogilvy">Social@Ogilvy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/technology/twitter">Twitter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/topic/youtube">Youtube</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding/retail">Retail</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding/creative">Creative</category>
 <category domain="http://www.adweek.com/advertising-branding/agency">Agency</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 10:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gabriel Beltrone</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">140368 at http://www.adweek.com</guid>
 <media:content url="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/general-thumbnail/news_article/unknown-1_1.jpeg" type="image/jpeg"> <media:title type="plain">Brand #Fail</media:title>
 <media:credit role="photographer">Gabriel Beltrone</media:credit>
 <media:thumbnail url="http://www.adweek.com/files/imagecache/general-thumbnail/news_article/unknown-1_1.jpeg" />
</media:content>
<feedburner:origLink>http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/brand-fail-140368</feedburner:origLink></item>
  </channel>
</rss>

